Paulo Pilotti Duarte

Everyone must have come across the famous image – whether it's a quote, a protest banner, a flag, or graffiti – of the worker who always assembles a machine gun from vacuum cleaner parts.

The phrase originates from the concept of alienation in factory workers. It symbolizes a factory worker who, detached from the final product, believes they are producing vacuum cleaners. However, as they start taking home pieces of the product, they realize it's a front for manufacturing machine guns. This metaphor reflects a laborer who invests their time working for an ideal they don't fully understand, thinking it's for the common good, when in reality, they're being used for harmful purposes by their employer or leader.

Additionally, it raises the question of how many of us can say we can afford the products we manufacture with the time we dedicate to making them. Workers often feel alienated from what they produce, lacking the rights to the products they create and receiving little in return. This highlights the truth of worker alienation.

One can draw parallels with the chaotic and blind situation of Manhattan Project workers, as seen in the recent film “Oppenheimer” by Christopher Nolan.

From an artistic perspective, it reminds me of the song about the man in black who assembles a Cadillac from stolen parts but ends up with a mishmash of various models, reflecting the concept of planned obsolescence and resulting in a “Homer's car.”

In this analysis of Harun Farocki's work “The Inextinguishable Fire,”, by Paulo Martins Filho, the author delves into the idea of responsibility in the face of violence and suffering, particularly regarding the use of napalm. The film confronts the viewer with a man who burns his own arm, highlighting the stark contrast between the concrete image of suffering and the indeterminate image conveyed through words. The essay also discusses how Farocki uses various sequences to engage the viewer in the ethical and moral implications of napalm production, including a satirical reenactment of a Dow Chemical factory meeting.

The final scene, with a man assuming different roles, emphasizes the role of workers, students, and engineers in the production process, showing that a factory can produce a wide range of items, from household appliances to weapons, depending on those involved. The text underlines the idea that responsibility cannot be dissociated from the products created, and the audience is called to confront the reality of their involvement in the processes that lead to suffering and violence.

This analysis provokes deep reflection on our role in the production and consequences of such products, ultimately emphasizing the responsibility that we all share in the face of violence and suffering.

The thing is: whatever your view and interpretation of the topic may be, the truth is that it's about the worker, the oppression of capital, and how the entire system is a “force” that destroys workers.

  • P

Using ChatGPT to try to create a Python script that makes a basic prediction about the price of a specific B3 stock. The idea is to use the CSV file with historical data and generate a forecast using the ARIMA model for prices next week.

Simple Stock Prediction.

TL;DR: It doesn't work very well; don't rely on it for anything.

  • P

Even though I can consider myself an English fluent speaker – not a bilingual person – I always have some troubles with the English verb tenses.

So, I made a 'cheat sheet' with the main verbs, a simple example, and how and when you can use them.

Maybe it can be useful to someone else

  • P

Jep. That is the true. The Israel state need to mantain – and support – Hamas in order to keep with the genocide agains't the palestinians.

There is no good guy in this war and the only ones who suffer are the people from both states, remember that.

Israel's Ambassador to the UN, Gilad Erdan, called for the immediate resignation of António Guterres. Guterres had requested a ceasefire in the Middle East at the Security Council and stated that the Hamas attacks, which killed 1,400 Israelis on October 7, did not happen in isolation, as Palestinians have endured “56 years of suffocating occupation.”

And always remember who you're sided with ...

  • P

Since the first Xbox, Microsoft took the easiest path: they created a gaming PC and sold it as a console. Before Steam Machine, Steam Deck, or Legion, Microsoft sold a gaming PC disguised as a console. Time has passed, and the Xbox has always been essentially that. So, developing any application or game for the Xbox has always been quite simple if you already know how to do it for a PC.

***

The year is 2023, and the web browser is omnipresent in almost everything. Chromium is ubiquitous (or nearly so), and everyone ends up developing their applications to run in the browser. This makes it easier for those like me, who have a work and personal computer, to reach the point of not needing an actual computer. The work computer runs Windows 11 and has everything one would expect (Office, Firefox) and serves me for approximately 8 hours daily. In the remaining hours and on weekends, I mainly occupy myself with the iPad and the Xbox, which is an unusual choice for most people.

The truth is, there's nothing extraordinary about it; for my use (gaming + web), it serves me well. I realized this when I was looking for a new computer for my mother after the state government in RS asked for the Chromebooks they had provided to teachers in 2020. When searching for a new computer, I discovered that my usage was more sporadic than my mother's, so I focused on listing what I used daily for personal access. The list includes:

  • Gmail
  • YouTube
  • YouTube Music
  • Google Podcasts
  • iCloud (now runs everything on the web, making my life much easier)
  • Telegram
  • WhatsApp
  • Twitter/Instagram/Bluesky/Mastodon (I don't actually use them anymore)
  • Vercel
  • Netflix
  • Prime Video
  • Mercado Livre
  • Amazon

If you notice, it's all essentially through a web browser. There's nothing there that can't be accessed by a modern browser. Luckily, the Xbox Series S has had one for a while. The Xbox Edge browser is the same (or nearly the same) as the one on Windows. Furthermore, the Xbox natively supports Bluetooth headsets, keyboards, and mice. If you encounter any issues, you can buy an adapter (although I think it's quite rare). Finally, the Xbox has 10GB of GDDR6 RAM, an SSD, an 8x Zen 2 Cores processor (3.6GHz), and an AMD RDNA (4 TF). Essentially, it's more than I need for my web browsing.

The keyboard has a few moments when it acts a bit quirky, and the Xbox overlays the virtual keyboard on the screen, but pressing “ESC” makes it disappear. The mouse has a stylized pointer, which I don't particularly like, but it's not bothersome (especially since I've learned to do everything via the keyboard lately). The browser is fast and responds very well, perhaps even better than Chrome or Firefox that I use at work. I can't speak about extensions because the only one I used was uBlock, and currently, I use PiHole directly on the router, so all ads are blocked there. YouTube runs smoothly in 1080p without hiccups. The Xbox's WiFi card seems to be much better than my old laptop; the signal is stronger, with the Xbox hitting 120Mbps where the other marked 45Mbps.

As a bonus, I also use it in conjunction with Game Pass Ultimate and have the games I play the most without major complications (Path of Exile, Diablo 2 Resurrected, Diablo 4, Age of Empires 4, and now Starfield). I do miss some of my Steam games, for example, but it's not a big deal.

In summary, my setup consists of:

  • Xbox Series S
  • Logitech MX Keys wireless keyboard
  • Logitech G603 wireless mouse
  • AOC Hero 27' monitor (144Hz)

  • P

How did the periphery make it to college?

I entered UFRGS in 2003. I was one of four students in that class who came from a public school. At that time, we didn't have quotas, so it was uncommon to have students from public schools at UFRGS, especially in exact sciences, which required a very peculiar and demanding study plan throughout the course. But fortunately, that has changed. Nowadays, many underprivileged individuals are at UFRGS, especially people of color and from public schools.

But in 2003 it wasn't like that, and I was there in 2003.

The professors needed to be more accustomed to the reality of financial limitations. However, today, most of the faculty can understand the different backgrounds that make up the student body.

But in 2003, it wasn't like that. My professors assigned extensive assignments and recommended attending conferences across the country. I didn't go, of course. In 2003, the university had no easy access to plane tickets or financial assistance. Or there was, but it was limited, very limited. And the research scholarship always paid poorly.

Where I came from, I was expected not to have hopes beyond a stable job at the GM factory or AMBEV. I am the only one among my childhood friends who don't work in a factory. Only one other friend and I are not “factory floor” workers. Interestingly (ironically), he and I are the only ones with a higher education degree. I was the only one among the six friends who traveled to Planeta Atlântida in 2002 who went to UFRGS. I did it because I got into UFRGS. It was my “bachelor party,” so to speak. After all, we didn't get into “Planeta,” but it was a week that generated stories for years.

But I'm not going to talk about that. I will speak about shocks, people, social class, and privileges.

I've never experienced racism, of course (I'm not black). However, I have always struggled with the lack of opportunities that a life in the periphery provides. Until I entered UFRGS, the idea of traveling abroad or living in a two-story apartment was bizarre. I didn't even know two-story apartments existed; a “triplex” was some sexual position I saw in the now-defunct Brazil Magazine. But that was relatively normal in the social class that dominated UFRGS in 2003. And it's not abnormal today; I can confirm that. Parents with higher education? Rare, if not non-existent. My mother is still the only one among the mothers who achieved it. My father didn't. My grandparents are all literate, but nothing more. Having a grandparent with money to help with daily struggles was a dream; my grandmother could only afford to buy a basic food basket to help us when my father lost his job. And that was a lot for those living on two minimum monthly wages.

Life in the periphery is more complex than people with blue hair and turbans can imagine.

The shocks came daily. People with cars are given as gifts. With credit cards – my father only got a credit card when he was over 40; before that, everything was paid in installments at Arapuã. I remember I once came with my parents on the Anchieta bus (the name of the bus line from downtown POA to Gravataí) with a microwave oven. Another time, I spent all my money buying a computer cabinet and had no money left for the return fare. But shocks.

During that time, UFRGS needed more diversity of opinions. It was mainly divided between radical identity politics activists and budding anarcho-capitalists. I don't remember being either of them, but my memory is fading as I approach 40. But the shocks continued. The duplex and triplex apartments. Cars are given as gifts by parents for passing the entrance exam. Trips abroad like their friends, backpacking in Eastern Europe, exchange programs in Ireland that “taught them to fend for themselves.”

Regarding self-sufficiency, it's a trend now for women, usually from upper-middle-class backgrounds, to claim that men are spoiled. But let me tell you, most women who complain that men are spoiled at 30 are just as spoiled as the men they criticize. But their ivory tower is so detached from the reality of Brazil that they see themselves as warriors. This doesn't mean men aren't spoiled; everyone in the upper class is spoiled. And these people are the majority on social media. They see themselves as “grown-ups” because they pay bills and clean the house. Where I come from, we've been doing that since we were 14. Cleaning the home started at age 9. My two neighbors have been working since they were 11, one helping his father, a bricklayer, and the other supporting his father, a mechanic. Occasionally, during vacations, I worked with them. I cleaned many vans owned by a friend's father. Our competition was to see who could find more change on the van floor (sometimes, we even had some forgotten snacks, but it had nothing to do with poverty; it was just messy). Helping at home was normal for both boys and girls, depending on who was the oldest. Another friend of mine always took care of his two sisters while his parents worked at a gas station. Starting to work at 14 and having a bill to pay (usually for water) was normal. College? Only I attended UFRGS. Only one other friend did; he got a scholarship to attend ULBRA. Going abroad was just on TV, at most to Uruguay, often to buy cheaper groceries. The wealthier ones would go shopping in Paraguay.

But of course, I'm spoiled because I live with my elderly mother. The real warriors are the women who wear Frida Kahlo tank tops and travel to London three times a year.

So, that was me in 2003. I had come from a completely different reality for them, having worked in my father's tobacco shop for two years. I had experience cleaning travel vans, selling Paraguayan magazines and cigarettes (and making hot dogs in a trailer). That was my reality. It still is. But at the time, I didn't realize this was an entirely invisible life within a specific social spectrum. Just as I was invisible to them, they were invisible to me. None of their concerns made sense to me or moved me. Their hardships were not something I took seriously. Just as my problems, to them, were sterile issues of a person without experience. After all, they had the same problems as those they were trying to help. The daily struggles of a person who worries about living alone at 19 didn't affect me because, in the periphery, we built a house in the backyard of our mother's property and lived there. The car was just that 10-year-old 1.0-liter one, preferably one without paying property tax. My father said insurance didn't exist; it was a rich people thing. Eating out? Only when we received our meal vouchers at the end of the month, and even then, it meant a trip to the food court at the Shopping do Vale with whatever was left from the groceries (why do groceries? Because the taxi from Big to home was expensive).

Of course, over time, I acquired

The habits of the class I was in contact with. I wanted to be rich like the majority there. I wanted to have the same problems. But you can't pretend forever that you're from the Moinhos district when Morada do Vale calls you every day, and the traffic jam on the Cachoeirinha bridge devours two hours of your life daily. This created a particular internal division in my personality. On the one hand, I knew my reality; on the other hand, I denied it to most people I interacted with. It wasn't out of malice, of course. It was an inability to cope with the impending shock when a world of limitations confronts a world of opportunities. My inability to deal with this new reality while remaining true to where I came from created social and psychological scars that were only resolved years later (many years later, I would say they were never fully resolved). They shaped a persona in me that no longer exists today (thankfully) but still exists in the imagination of many people who knew me then. It's like an autoimmune disease that occasionally attacks me and reminds me of what I went through and how incapable I was in 2003.

Are these shocks necessary? I don't think so, but they happen, especially to those from the bottom of the social pyramid. I came from there, and I'm still there, but today, I no longer get shocked, and I can channel that reality shock into something more substantial (class resentment, peace among us, war to the masters). But that doesn't remove the scar I and everyone in the same situation carry. Branded with a hot iron on the back. The constant feeling of “you don't belong here.”

These various shocks still resonate with me to this day, to the point that I reject the ideological identity-based left, which plays the flute and travels to London during summer vacations.

In 2003, UFRGS was a dream-crushing machine. It turned everyone into hamburger patties after four years. I feel that this has changed a lot with the introduction of quotas (although they are still poorly received in many courses; I even remember a classmate from that time saying that campus robberies would increase now that there were “a bunch of quota students”).

That's why I don't believe in the university left, the student movement, the idealistic posturing, identity politics, and all the nonsense the middle class has created to absolve their bourgeois guilt. The only way forward is through rupture.

But this is not a text about the left or rupture. It's a text about shocks. And I've talked about my biggest shock in 38 years: my poverty.

  • P

a heart with a deep green background

“I never felt open in any way. I would never impulsively ring people and assume that they’d want to see me, or just go ground. I always had to sit down and think very hard before I knocked on anybody’s door. And consequently, I never really knocked.”

  • P

The United States usually doesn't see the rest of the world as “civilized” (even though the USA is the only “first world country” listed as the most violent city in the world). But this could change with the last occurrence (like the Ukrainian war and the Hamas-Israel conflict).

The two main highlights for South America can indicate a new external politics. But, as the poet once said, we will see.

Agreement in Venezuela 1

The government of Venezuela has released opposition-linked prisoners as part of an agreement reached this week with its political adversaries. The terms also include holding free elections in the second half of 2024, with the presence of international observers. / O Globo

Agreement in Venezuela 2

In return, the U.S. has lifted economic sanctions on Venezuelan oil, gas, and gold. The podcast “Durma com Essa” explores the political detente in the South American country and explains the lingering uncertainties surrounding it. / Nexo

  • P

You might wonder: who is Waldemar Lemos? Why did he become the coach of Flamengo twice? And, most importantly, why was he booed at his presentation?

These questions – and others – are what the ESPN+ mini-documentary will answer. Or at least attempt to. Either way, it's worth checking out the most iconic moment in Brazilian football history of the last 20 years and probably the biggest sports meme in the world.

Folha de São Paulo even did a good piece on the documentary, I highlight:

In the post-game press conference, Oswaldo sadly calculated: “Adding Flamengo, Fluminense, São Paulo, and Vasco, I have 14 months of unpaid salary.” And why didn't Waldemar leave with him? The answer is simple: “I was on a permanent contract (CLT),” he says in the documentary, adding that he wouldn't resign, like any good CLT. So, Waldemar conducted training as usual on that Tuesday, the 14th.

With no money, President Hélio Ferraz wanted a cheap solution. At some point, they came up with the name Waldemar Lemos, a homegrown solution (apparently, Hélio took a tip from goalkeeper Julio Cesar). The striker Edílson, also known as Capetinha, gave an interview saying that the team preferred someone familiar. And he mentioned Waldemar.

Waldemar agreed, had an excellent campaign in late 2003, and took the red and black to eighth place. Nonetheless, he was let go at the end of the year.

The reenactment that the documentary provides with all the people involved is delightful. Cícero Mello admits that he didn't realize at the press conference that Mr. Waldemar and Waldemar Lemos were the same person. Peruano, the leader of the taunting, recalls that they wanted former striker Nunes and were prepared to insult any other name.

[...]

The documentary does well to delve into Lemos' life, a suburban from Realengo who still does great social work with children from the neighborhood to this day. Lemos went on to coach other teams and even returned to Flamengo in 2006, only to be fired after taking the team to the Copa do Brasil final – where the coach was Ney Franco.

Literally incredible.

Porque Waldemar? – Directed by: Mendel Bydlowski and Wagner Patti. – 3-episode series (52 min. each). – Premieres on ESPN, Sat. (14), at 10 p.m.; other episodes on the 21st and 28th (in full on Star+, starting on Saturday).

  • P

I was reading this post about the chances of a new Leicester in the future of the Premier League. The post is excellent. Read it.

England has the famous “big six,” which makes it easier to classify all other clubs as underdogs or Leicesters. In Brazil, it’s challenging to define the major clubs.

Everyone knows that only teams from SP, RJ, and Cruzeiro have won the Brazilian Championship since the switch to the round-robin format. The round-robin format reduces the chances of better teams not winning after 38 rounds. The better teams are almost always the richer ones, which are usually the big clubs. I won’t go into which clubs are considered significant or big. Yet. But, excluding Cruzeiro, only teams from the two wealthiest states in the country have managed to win the Brazilian Championship. This excludes big teams like Inter, Grêmio, and Galo, who even won Libertadores during this period.

So, the round-robin championship represents a barrier within a limited number of possible title contenders. Starting to answer the title question.

The chance for a smaller team is slight because, in Brazilian football, there are many big teams. It’s easier to have an underdog in a league with 18 underdogs where only two teams need to falter than in one where half the table is considered big clubs. And Brazil has the traditional 12. But Bahia and the emerging CAP should be on this list; some might argue that Botafogo is no longer big since Túlio. And so it goes.

To define underdog teams, you need to determine the group of “big” teams. “Big” in quotes because it has nothing to do with the distant history and achievements. Damn it, Tottenham is one of the big six. So, the big clubs at the moment aren’t historically big clubs, but of course, history still plays a part.

In an interview, Lisca stated that there are currently seven “giants.” According to him:

These are the giants today because, besides giving you structure, they pay well, provide good players, and give you the conditions to do great work.

These are my criteria, summarized as clubs with better financial conditions and more significant investment potential in the short and medium term. Thus, the “giants” for Lisca are Grêmio, Inter, Flamengo, Corinthians, Santos, São Paulo, and Palmeiras.

He leaves out Cruzeiro, Vasco, and Botafogo, the three prime examples of completely bankrupt big teams, and I agree with the coach. Leaving Galo out is absurd, especially since 2021 was the year of the new Selegalo. But does anyone believe in the next few years that Fluminense and CAP will compete for the Brazilian Championship against Grêmio, a better-managed São Paulo, or a resurgent Corinthians? I don’t believe it.

Not to mention the two richest clubs in Brazil: Flamengo and Palmeiras. If well managed and with a shorter calendar, these two would compete in the Brazilian Championship like Man City and Liverpool have in recent years.

The list of clubs that people would be surprised to win the Brazilian Championship, as with Leicester, certainly does not include Flamengo, Palmeiras, Atlético, São Paulo, Corinthians, Inter, and Grêmio.

If not all at the moment, these clubs, history, tradition, and fans have the most potential to have financial investment power in football for the next few years. These are, in a very shallow analysis, indeed the seven “giants” that Brazil has at the moment. Our Brazilian big seven.

The issue with Brazil is that this group would be different ten years ago. Brazilian football is much more volatile than English football. Nevertheless, it still is, which is excellent. The so-called “Spanishization” of Brazilian football, talked about for a long time, still seems a bit far off.

Of course, there are no more fools; football is about the moment, a box of surprises, and everything is very level.

But where’s Santos (which, for me, is the greatest club in Brazil’s history)? And why isn’t Pelé’s club here? Simple. It’s challenging to stay competitive in today’s football when you’re from a remote city with less than 500,000 inhabitants and without massive media support.

When I talk about being competitive, I specifically mean having the squad and conditions to compete in the round-robin Brazilian Championship round after round against Flamengo and Palmeiras. The Copa do Brasil and Libertadores are another story. The great Inter teams of the 2000s, Renato’s Grêmio, which may have been one of the greatest Grêmio teams in history, and Neymar’s Santos couldn’t win the round-robin Brazilian Championship. It’s a very tough championship for those outside the “axis.” TL;DR?

What are the chances of a club that is not Flamengo, São Paulo, Palmeiras, and Corinthians; Grêmio and Inter; Cruzeiro or Atlético Mineiro winning the Brazilian Championship in the next few years?

We can include Fluminense, Santos, CAP, Vasco, and Botafoto on the list if you want. What needs to be analyzed is the possibility of a club outside of SP, RJ, POA, BH, or Santos winning the Brazilian Championship.

  • P